Friday, March 16, 2007

Eco is Luxe


Environment consciousness is at best a luxury in a developing country like India.

We might shrug this off by calling it a shortsighted view but there is truth in what I just said. It is a luxury because
·We have a country where we need to reach food for living to a LARGE number of people and we can’t depend on flimsy paper bags to carry it, we need poly-film to help us reach it intact and reach it cost effectively.

·We have billions who need to be kept warm thus we need to burn fossil fuel & firewood

·We have millions who want to celebrate their festivals with all the fanfare and we can’t ban all the firecrackers

·We have innumerable thirsty throats that need clean and bottled water and we can’t deny it for there is a dip in the water table

We are a country that has an over-grown population & an over-developed democracy but an under-developed economy and stilted governance & public administration. This disequilibrium is that is at the root of many of the challenges that we are facing as a nation and an ecosystem!

Like the ecosystem maintains a dynamic equilibrium with itself so is needed an equilibrium between Democracy, Economy and Ecology.
Today, none of these is in harmony with the other.

The challenge is not limited to a developing nation like India. Even developed nations are facing it though in different ways. Let’s talk about the much talked about Organic Wave. Why is there a backlash to Organic food with questions being raised as to what is the real organic?
Is milk and meat from cattle that roams and feeds on ‘live’ grass (that is not grown with pesticides) and comes back to the cattle-shed in the evening to be milked, more organic than the cattle that does not have to leave the shed and feeds on similar pesticide free grass which is pre cut? Perhaps yes perhaps we do not know.
A more fundamental question to ask is that why can’t we afford to send the cow out in the fields? The answer usually would be “we do not have the luxury of time to do that because demand waits for no one” (not even till cows come home!). And what does this overbearing demand represent? This demand represents the large population that needs to have their morning cup of milk every day regularly and in good quantities. The large population (a species called humans) has grown ‘inorganically’ and has an inorganic agenda for survival, but it wants to live healthy – organically. It is perhaps a huge paradox of our times because a species that ‘lives’ inorganically (medicines/ vaccines/ surgeries/ implants/ augmentations etc.) cannot realistically have a ‘lifestyle’ that is organic (food etc.).

When these challenges are rampant in developed nations (US) with small population base (density 31/sqkm) how can we be surprised to see the adverse impact of this rampant population growth and the subsequent degradation of environment in over populated (density 329/sq km) & under developed countries like India.

Challenges facing a developing country go far and wide beyond over-population. We have problems to address as as rampant migration, lack of education and sometimes-even lack of regulations . Together all of them pose a much bigger challenge than what brands can realistically handle.

Eco friendliness is a luxury that brands in developing countries cannot afford, not at least in the short term!

The way to approach this challenge is to not just look at the responsibilities of brands and marketers but to look at what role does government have to play in solving these fundamental challenges.

For brands and marketers a more realistic target would be to create perceptions of eco-friendliness for themselves based on their activities, no matter how micro they are, and hope that this also leads to a larger set of people becoming conscious of their responsibilities towards environment in one way or the other.
No wonder we have public and private initiatives like the DTC Bus service in Delhi, which is the largest CNG, bus service network in the world. There are brands like Allen Solly and many others that promote only recycled paper bags. We even have hospitality chains like Ecotel Hotels that have been certified as completely environment friendly. British Petroleum has launched Oorja - a smoke free chulha for rural markets in India. The chulha burns the fuel optimally and reduces the smoke dramatically.

It is interesting to note that while eco conscious brands, products and marketing seems to connote luxury at the top-end, which in turn triggers adoption; at the bottom-end eco friendliness has to stand for efficiency and value to attract trials and adoption.
Though all of these might look like small steps but they are all in the right direction.

The long march to eco responsibility has just begun and we have a long way to go. The good news is that we at least know the direction we need to take.

13 comments:

Rasika said...

You, like many other Indians find it extremely easy to blame the problems of the country on the country itself. This is India, is not an explanation for why things go wrong or why things are a certain way. It is the people who make a country what it is.

Environmental consciousness does not mean avoiding eating, drinking, sleeping, travelling or living.It simply means that one is aware of the consequences of their actions and thinks of alternate methods of doing what we usually do :) And I fail to see why we cannot ban fireworks, simply because it is part and parcel of tradition..just because things were/are done a certain way does not mean they are the right way. Nobody is asking you to stay thirsty - but why don't you take shorter showers? Not use hoses to clean cars? We need 'energy' to cook - that energy does not have to come from fuel or firewood..great minds are working on finding economical means of providing efficient energy to masses.

I think YOU need to change your viewpoint and stop using our poverty and population size as an excuse for being callous.

Subramaniam Avinash said...

Whoa! That's some comment. And I tend to agree with it.

Saurabh Sharma said...

Thanks for your feedback Rasika. I understand your point of view.

Rasika said...

'I understand your view', makes you sound all high and mighty and me a spoilt child:)

I get carried away when it comes to be env friendly. I just moved back from Sydney in nov and find it extremely frustrating at the lack of repect for our environment..and having to hear comments about, its already filthy, so what's the point!

neways..its good that you guys started a planning blog..i'll get the other planners at jwt to come vist and participate.

blaiq said...

Thanks, Rasika. We always look forward to more participants joining in the Thotblurb conversation.

Kaj said...

Hey Rasika, glad you enjoyed the link (or not!) BTW I caught up with some cjmites in bby and it was totally awesome - despite being mostly married and 'settled' practically everyone is as fiesty as ever!! yayyy!!

Anonymous said...

But, before i begin, it's time for a disclaimer: I work in the same agency as Saurabh, but look at a very different part of the business.

I think Saubs point of view was to highlight what a growing consciousness overseas is seen as, through the lens of our own culture.

Many years ago, i worked for a someone who set up her own brand in the organic foods/wellness space. It's doing much better than the time it started out - in part because the appreciation of "dehati" goods is growing, and in part, because she's found a very good backer - who can get her placement and tackle distribution issues.

What's interesting is the bi-polar strategy that might need to be adopted to straddle the spectrum of the market for environmentally correct products.

Perhaps, one large step forward is to target industrialists relentlessly, even to the extent of handing out market credits for safety in waste disposal, by-product processing norms and so on.

Saurabh Sharma said...

Rasika I do believe that there is merit in what you are saying.

I understand your sentiments especially after coming to know that you've lived/visited a developed and much less populated country like Australia.

I believe that we could take steps in the interim, but at the same time I firmly believe that any attempt to protect the environment that does not include a durable plan for curbing population growth would be short-term, halfhearted and difficult to implement.

Anonymous said...

Saurabh - this might seem like music to your ears (i certainly hope so..)

but have you read about the plans to create the world's first sustainable city at Dontang near Shanghai?

Arup Engineering has actually designed the blueprint for such a project, and some of the work is already underway.

Subramaniam Avinash said...

An Indian company has been entrusted with the task of designing the world's first sustainable city in China? Sweet.

blaiq said...

A recent article in The Economist details out the plans for Dontang and also Arup's involvement (one I had read but I had totally forgotten about Arup.)

As always, I'd be glad to mail the article to anyone who doesn't have access to the Economist archive online.

Subramaniam Avinash said...

Plkease do mail it to me. I had also requested you to mail me the article about mobile phones some time back. I guess you forgot. Can you send that to me also? Please. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

get to know my first site -

[url=http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-paxil-paxil-lawsuits] paxil overdose [/url]

http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-paxil-paxil-lawsuits
[url=http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-paxil-paxil-lawsuits] paxil xr [/url]